The former US president’s latest threat to introduce an further full import duty on products from China has been called a “classic case” of United States’ contradictory behavior, as stated by the Beijing administration.
A representative of the ministry additionally remarked that the nation could implement its own undisclosed “countermeasures” if the US President carries out his warning, emphasizing that the country was “unafraid” of a potential commercial battle.
This past Friday, the former president retaliated at China’s decision to strengthen its policies for overseas sales of rare earths, accusing Beijing of “becoming very hostile” and attempting to hold the international market “under its control”.
Additionally, he vowed to cancel a planned meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping, which was expected to take place during a conference in Seoul later this month.
The former president’s remarks on Friday unsettled stock exchanges, with the S&P 500 share index falling by over two and a half percent, marking its steepest fall since earlier this year.
His comments reignited concerns of a trade conflict between the US and China.
This past spring, the both nations had consented to eliminate significant levies on each other’s goods, which had raised the prospect of commerce ceasing between the economic powers.
Consequently, United States levies on Chinese goods incurring an added import tax compared with the start of the year, while items from the United States entering the country are subject to a import levy.
China’s latest remarks – issued by the Ministry of Commerce in the manner of official answers to press queries – mirrored language from the peak of the ongoing trade dispute.
They criticised American limits on exports on electronic components while justifying the country’s own overseas sale regulations on rare earth minerals as “routine measures” to protect domestic safety and that of all nations.
The spokesperson said that for “a long time”, the US had “expanded the interpretation” of national security, abused foreign shipment regulations and “enforced” unfair treatments against the Chinese nation.
“Resorting to tariff threats is not the correct approach to interact with China,” the official said.
“China’s position on a import duty dispute has always been steady: we do not want one, but we are unafraid of one.”
Recently, the Chinese government revealed it was tightening overseas sale regulations on rare earth minerals and additional substances critical for advanced tech manufacturing.
The action was viewed as a key move, as the country processes about the vast majority of the global rare earth supply, which are utilized in products such as solar panels and smartphones.
New remarks from Washington and Beijing are being viewed by some as a method of strengthening positions ahead of upcoming negotiations.
Remains uncertain whether a talks between Trump and Xi Jinping, planned at a summit in Seoul before month’s end, will still proceed.